The U.S. Copyright Office Rules AI-Generated Works Are Not Copyrightable—For Now

On January 29, 2025, the U.S. Copyright Office released its latest report addressing one of the most debated topics in the creative and legal worlds: Can AI-generated content be protected under copyright law? The agency’s conclusion was clear—purely AI-generated works are not eligible for copyright protection. While this decision aligns with existing copyright laws, it raises new questions about the evolving role of AI in human creativity.

AI and Copyright: What the Law Says

For centuries, copyright law has protected works that originate from human creativity. The Copyright Office reaffirmed that human authorship remains a fundamental requirement for a work to receive legal protection. AI-generated outputs, even when created using detailed and iterative text prompts, do not meet this standard because the final expression is ultimately controlled by the AI system, not the user.

The report emphasized that prompts function as instructions rather than direct creative input. No matter how detailed or complex a prompt is, the user cannot predict or fully control the final outcome. Because of this, the AI-generated results lack the necessary human authorship to qualify for copyright protection. This reasoning led to the denial of copyright for “Théâtre D’opéra Spatial”, an award-winning image created using the AI tool Midjourney. Despite the creator's claim of inputting and refining prompts hundreds of times, the Copyright Office ruled that the final output was still fundamentally AI-generated.

Where AI-Assisted Works Stand

While fully AI-generated content remains unprotected, the Copyright Office acknowledged that AI can be used as a tool in the creative process without compromising a work’s copyrightability. If a human selects, modifies, or arranges AI-generated elements in a way that demonstrates meaningful creative control, then the final product may still qualify for protection.

For example, a comic book incorporating AI-generated images could be copyrightable if a human author arranges those images and combines them with original text. Likewise, a film using AI-generated special effects would still be protected, even though the AI effects themselves are not. The key factor is whether a human contributes a significant creative effort beyond merely generating an AI output.

The report also clarified that artists who feed their own work into an AI system for enhancement or modification may retain copyright protection over their original contributions. If the human-created aspects remain recognizable and distinct, then copyright law will continue to apply to those portions.

The Uncertain Future of AI and Copyright

The Copyright Office acknowledged that AI technology is rapidly evolving. While current AI systems do not allow users to exert enough control to be considered authors, this could change in the future. If AI tools eventually enable users to dictate specific creative elements in a way that makes the AI's role purely mechanical, copyright law may need to be reconsidered. However, as of now, the agency sees no need for legislative changes.

This stance aligns with the Copyright Office’s broader initiative to address AI-related legal challenges. In 2024, it published a report advocating for deepfake laws to protect individuals from unauthorized digital replicas. The next phase of its research will focus on whether AI companies should be allowed to train models on copyrighted material without permission—another contentious issue with significant implications for artists, writers, and musicians.

What This Means for Creators

For digital artists, musicians, and writers experimenting with AI, this ruling clarifies where copyright protections begin and end. If AI is merely a tool assisting in the creative process, the final work can still be protected. But if AI generates the work in its entirety, the output remains unprotected and open for public use.

While AI tools like Midjourney, Gemini, and ChatGPT are revolutionizing creative industries, they are not replacing human authorship in the eyes of the law. The Copyright Office’s ruling ensures that copyright protection remains tied to human creativity, at least for now. However, as AI systems become more sophisticated, this debate is far from over.

Will the future bring new legal frameworks to address AI’s role in content creation? That remains to be seen, but for now, if a machine creates it, you don’t own it.

Save hours of work with my AI-powered Business & Legal Prompt Bundle – Click here to get started!